有人用过F-P干涉仪吗?请教透射能量问题
<p class="MsoNormal" style="MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt;"><span style="FONT-FAMILY: 宋体; mso-ascii-font-family: Times New Roman; mso-hansi-font-family: Times New Roman;">一般</span><span lang="EN-US"><font face="Times New Roman">F-P</font></span><span style="FONT-FAMILY: 宋体; mso-ascii-font-family: Times New Roman; mso-hansi-font-family: Times New Roman;">干涉仪平板的内表面需镀高反膜,反射率达</span><span lang="EN-US"><font face="Times New Roman">95</font></span><span style="FONT-FAMILY: 宋体; mso-ascii-font-family: Times New Roman; mso-hansi-font-family: Times New Roman;">%以上,是否会造成</span><span lang="EN-US"><font face="Times New Roman">95</font></span><span style="FONT-FAMILY: 宋体; mso-ascii-font-family: Times New Roman; mso-hansi-font-family: Times New Roman;">%以上的能量直接在入射时直接被反射无法进入</span><span lang="EN-US"><font face="Times New Roman">F-P</font></span><span style="FONT-FAMILY: 宋体; mso-ascii-font-family: Times New Roman; mso-hansi-font-family: Times New Roman;">干涉仪,而仅有</span><span lang="EN-US"><font face="Times New Roman">5</font></span><span style="FONT-FAMILY: 宋体; mso-ascii-font-family: Times New Roman; mso-hansi-font-family: Times New Roman;">%的能量能被干涉仪所利用? 按照</span><span lang="EN-US"><font face="Times New Roman">F-P</font></span><span style="FONT-FAMILY: 宋体; mso-ascii-font-family: Times New Roman; mso-hansi-font-family: Times New Roman;">工作原理多光束干涉原理推导得出的光经</span><span lang="EN-US"><font face="Times New Roman">F-P</font></span><span style="FONT-FAMILY: 宋体; mso-ascii-font-family: Times New Roman; mso-hansi-font-family: Times New Roman;">后峰值透过率能达到</span><span lang="EN-US"><font face="Times New Roman">90</font></span><span style="FONT-FAMILY: 宋体; mso-ascii-font-family: Times New Roman; mso-hansi-font-family: Times New Roman;">%左右,这该如何解释?</span></p> <p>镀95%的反射膜,进入F-P干涉仪的能量确实很少,波形中峰顶透过率高、峰谷低,</p> <p>那波形中的峰值透过率波长处的能量是否应考虑应该只考虑被反射95%以后剩下的能量呢?</p> <p>看来你还是没弄明白。</p><p>不同波长的透过率是不同的,两边都镀95%时,理论上波峰处的透过率为100%,谷底的透过率接近0.</p><p>波峰\波谷的位置与干涉仪的厚度有关.</p> <p>今天仔细看了光学原理的多光束干涉原理,已经明白了,看来很多问题还是应该从基本原理着手。</p><p>谢谢版主提点。</p> <p>今天仔细看了光学原理的多光束干涉原理,已经明白了,看来很多问题还是应该从基本原理着手。</p><p>谢谢版主提点。</p> {:6_143:}
页:
[1]